- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- P16 2.0 vs TK18
Acebeam P16 2.0 vs Acebeam TK18
What P16 2.0 does better (0) and where TK18 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is P16 2.0 better than TK18?
P16 2.0 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is TK18 better than P16 2.0?
TK18 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 3,000 lm | 3,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 73,712 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 543 m | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SFT-42R | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion | 18650 Li-ion |
| Battery capacity | 3,000 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 30 h | — |
| Rechargeable | Yes | — |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 1.5 m | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | Copper |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 136.3 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 32 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 25 mm | — |
| Weight | 169 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Dual switches | — |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
