- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- P16 2.0 vs LD35R
Acebeam P16 2.0 vs Fenix LD35R
What P16 2.0 does better (4) and where LD35R wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
P16 2.0LD35R
| P16 2.0 | LD35R | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 136.3 mm | 136.4 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 32 mm | 34 mm | −2 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 25 mm | 25.4 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Weight | 169 g | 185 g | −16 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is P16 2.0 better than LD35R?
- Peak beam intensity73,712 cd vs 28,390 cd2.6×
- Maximum output3,000 lm vs 1,800 lm+67%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)543 m vs 337 m+61%
- Weight169 g vs 185 g+9%
Why is LD35R better than P16 2.0?
- Maximum runtime30 h vs 101.9 h3.4×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 3,000 lm | 1,800 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 73,712 cd | 28,390 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 543 m | 337 m |
| Light source | LED | COB LED panel |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SFT-42R | Luminus SST-40 |
| LED maker | Luminus | Luminus |
| Colour temperature | — | 6,500K |
| Adjustable colour temperature | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion | 18650 Li-ion, CR123A |
| Battery capacity | 3,000 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 30 h | 101.9 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 1.5 m | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Magnetic tail / base | — | Yes |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 136.3 mm | 136.4 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 32 mm | 34 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 25 mm | 25.4 mm |
| Weight | 169 g | 185 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Dual switches | — |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | Yes |
| Red light | — | Yes |
| Green / blue / RGB light | — | Yes |
