- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- P16 2.0 vs Artorch
Acebeam P16 2.0 vs Nextorch Artorch
What P16 2.0 does better (5) and where Artorch wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is P16 2.0 better than Artorch?
- Maximum output3,000 lm vs 1,600 lm+88%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)543 m vs 300 m+81%
- Peak beam intensity73,712 cd vs 22,500 cd3.3×
- Battery capacity3,000 mAh vs 1,400 mAh2.1×
- Maximum runtime30 h vs 19 h+58%
Why is Artorch better than P16 2.0?
- Weight169 g vs 120 g+41%
- Impact resistance (drop)1.5 m vs 2 m+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 3,000 lm | 1,600 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 73,712 cd | 22,500 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 543 m | 300 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SFT-42R | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion | 18350 Li-ion |
| Battery capacity | 3,000 mAh | 1,400 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 30 h | 19 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 1.5 m | 2 m |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 136.3 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 32 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 25 mm | — |
| Weight | 169 g | 120 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Dual switches | Rotary / scroll wheel |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
