How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare791 models · updated Oct 21, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. P16 2.0 vs Warrior X4

Acebeam P16 2.0 vs Olight Warrior X4

What P16 2.0 does better (4) and where Warrior X4 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Acebeam P16 2.0
Acebeam · 2025P16 2.0
7.2Score
4 advantages≈ $100
Higher score
vs
Olight Warrior X4
Olight · 2024Warrior X4
5.3Score
1 advantage≈ $95
8.1Brightness & throw7.9
3.8Battery & charging2.8
6.3Build & durability3.6
5.9Features5.9

Why is P16 2.0 better than Warrior X4?

  1. Battery capacity3,000 mAh vs 500 mAh6×
  2. Maximum runtime30 h vs 8 h3.8×
  3. Maximum output3,000 lm vs 2,600 lm+15%
  4. Weight169 g vs 249 g+47%

Why is Warrior X4 better than P16 2.0?

  1. Beam distance (ANSI FL1)543 m vs 630 m+16%
Specifications

Side by side

Acebeam P16 2.0Acebeam P16 2.0≈ $1007.2
Light output
Maximum output3,000 lm2,600 lm
Peak beam intensity73,712 cd—
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)543 m630 m
Light sourceLEDLED
LED & beam
LED emitterLuminus SFT-42R—
LED makerLuminus—
Number of LEDs—8
Battery & charging
Battery18650 Li-ionBuilt-in Li-ion / Li-Po
Battery capacity3,000 mAh500 mAh
Maximum runtime30 h8 h
RechargeableYesYes
USB-C chargingYesYes
Battery level indicator—Yes
Build & durability
Protection ratingIP68—
Water protection (IPx)IPx8—
Impact resistance (drop)1.5 m—
Body materialAluminiumAluminium
Pocket clipYes—
Size & weight
Length / height136.3 mm150 mm
Head diameter / width32 mm—
Body diameter / depth25 mm—
Weight169 g249 g
Modes & features
SwitchDual switches—
StrobeYesYes
SOS / beaconYes—
Colours—Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare