- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- P16 2.0 vs Angel Eyes E60
Acebeam P16 2.0 vs RovyVon Angel Eyes E60
What P16 2.0 does better (2) and where Angel Eyes E60 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.1Brightness & throw4.8
3.8Battery & charging4.0
6.3Build & durability8.4
5.9Features5.9
Why is P16 2.0 better than Angel Eyes E60?
- Maximum output3,000 lm vs 1,500 lm2×
- Battery capacity3,000 mAh vs 2,000 mAh+50%
Why is Angel Eyes E60 better than P16 2.0?
- Weight169 g vs 95 g+78%
- Maximum runtime30 h vs 47 h+57%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 3,000 lm | 1,500 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 73,712 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 543 m | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SFT-42R | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Colour temperature | — | 7,000K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Battery capacity | 3,000 mAh | 2,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 30 h | 47 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 1.5 m | 1.5 m |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Magnetic tail / base | — | Yes |
| Pocket clip | Yes | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 136.3 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 32 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 25 mm | — |
| Weight | 169 g | 95 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Dual switches | — |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Red light | — | Yes |
| UV light | — | Yes |
| Laser pointer / aiming laser | — | Yes |
