- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- P20 vs W10 Pro LEP
Acebeam P20 vs Acebeam W10 Pro LEP
What P20 does better (3) and where W10 Pro LEP wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.4Brightness & throw7.7
8.0Battery & charging2.9
6.8Build & durability7.8
5.9Features5.9
Why is P20 better than W10 Pro LEP?
- Maximum output5,600 lm vs 750 lm7.5×
- Maximum runtime74 h vs 4 h18.5×
- Peak beam intensity528,529 cd vs 507,656 cd+4%
Why is W10 Pro LEP better than P20?
W10 Pro LEP has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 5,600 lm | 750 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 528,529 cd | 507,656 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 1,454 m | 1,425 m |
| Runtime at maximum output | — | 240 min |
| Light source | LED | LEP (laser-excited phosphor) |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | 21700 Li-ion |
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 74 h | 4 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 1.5 m | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Dual switches | Tail switch |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
