How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare791 models · updated Oct 21, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. Rider RX 2.0 vs WF11E ATEX

Acebeam Rider RX 2.0 vs Fenix WF11E ATEX

What Rider RX 2.0 does better (1) and where WF11E ATEX wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Acebeam Rider RX 2.0
Acebeam · 2023Rider RX 2.0
4.6Score
1 advantage≈ $55
Higher score
vs
Fenix WF11E ATEX
Fenix · 2023WF11E ATEX
0 advantages≈ $65
3.2Brightness & throw2.8

Why is Rider RX 2.0 better than WF11E ATEX?

  1. Maximum output700 lm vs 200 lm3.5×

Why is WF11E ATEX better than Rider RX 2.0?

WF11E ATEX has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Light output
Maximum output700 lm200 lm
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)—185 m
Light sourceLEDLED
LED & beam
LED emitterNichia 519A—
LED makerNichia—
Colour rendering (CRI)90—
Battery & charging
Battery14500 Li-ion, AAAA
Maximum runtime—10 h
RechargeableYes—
Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123AYes—
Build & durability
Body materialTitanium—
Size & weight
Length / height96 mm—
Modes & features
Colours—Orange
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare