- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- Rider RX 2.0 vs Taschenlampe 3315 138
Acebeam Rider RX 2.0 vs Peli Taschenlampe 3315 138
What Rider RX 2.0 does better (1) and where Taschenlampe 3315 138 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.8Brightness & throw2.7
Why is Rider RX 2.0 better than Taschenlampe 3315 138?
- Maximum output700 lm vs 138 lm5.1×
Why is Taschenlampe 3315 138 better than Rider RX 2.0?
Taschenlampe 3315 138 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 700 lm | 138 lm |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | — | 146 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Nichia 519A | — |
| LED maker | Nichia | — |
| Colour rendering (CRI) | 90 | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 14500 Li-ion, AA | AA |
| Number of batteries | — | 3 |
| Rechargeable | Yes | — |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Body material | Titanium | Plastic / polymer |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 96 mm | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Colours | — | Yellow |
