- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- T29 Ultra vs HT18R V2.0
Acebeam T29 Ultra vs Fenix HT18R V2.0
What T29 Ultra does better (4) and where HT18R V2.0 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.7Brightness & throw8.9
9.2Battery & charging8.4
5.3Build & durability4.3
5.9Features5.9
Why is T29 Ultra better than HT18R V2.0?
- Maximum runtime163 h vs 87 h+87%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)1,400 m vs 1,100 m+27%
- Peak beam intensity490,000 cd vs 302,500 cd+62%
- Weight308 g vs 358 g+16%
Why is HT18R V2.0 better than T29 Ultra?
- Maximum output2,900 lm vs 3,700 lm+28%
- Battery capacity5,600 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+7%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 2,900 lm | 3,700 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 490,000 cd | 302,500 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 1,400 m | 1,100 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SFT-42R | Luminus SFT-90 |
| LED maker | Luminus | Luminus |
| Colour temperature | — | 6,500K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | 21700 Li-ion |
| Battery capacity | 5,600 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 163 h | 87 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | — | 1.5 m |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 1.5 m | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | 308 g | 358 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Dual switches, Remote pressure switch | Side switch |
| Tactical tail switch (momentary on) | Yes | — |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | — | Yes |
| Lockout | — | Yes |
| Mode memory | — | Yes |
| Colours | — | Black |
