- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- TAC AA 2.0 vs E06R
Acebeam TAC AA 2.0 vs Fenix E06R
What TAC AA 2.0 does better (3) and where E06R wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.7Brightness & throw3.3
5.6Battery & charging4.7
6.9Build & durability9.4
3.4Light quality9.7
5.9Features5.9
Why is TAC AA 2.0 better than E06R?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)360 m vs 110 m3.3×
- Peak beam intensity32,400 cd vs 3,020 cd10.7×
- Maximum output1,000 lm vs 700 lm+43%
Why is E06R better than TAC AA 2.0?
- Brightness levels4 vs 102.5×
- Maximum runtime58 h vs 60 h+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,000 lm | 700 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 32,400 cd | 3,020 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 360 m | 110 m |
| Runtime at maximum output | 45 min | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SFT-25R | Luminus SST-12 |
| LED maker | Luminus | Luminus |
| Number of LEDs | — | 2 |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | 6,500K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AA | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Battery capacity | — | 750 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 58 h | 60 h |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | 2 m | — |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 1.5 m | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Magnetic tail / base | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | — | 69 mm |
| Head diameter / width | — | 29 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | — | 16 mm |
| Weight | — | 54 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 4 | 10 |
| Switch | Tail switch | — |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Red light | — | Yes |
| UV light | — | Yes |
| Laser pointer / aiming laser | — | Yes |
| Lockout | — | Yes |
| Mode memory | — | Yes |
| Colours | — | Grey, Red, Silver |
