- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- TAC AA 2.0 vs MT1A Pro
Acebeam TAC AA 2.0 vs Nitecore MT1A Pro
What TAC AA 2.0 does better (3) and where MT1A Pro wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.9Brightness & throw3.3
4.7Battery & charging3.0
6.5Build & durability9.4
3.5Light quality2.6
5.9Features5.9
Why is TAC AA 2.0 better than MT1A Pro?
- Maximum runtime58 h vs 10 h5.8×
- Maximum output1,000 lm vs 800 lm+25%
- Brightness levels4 vs 3+33%
Why is MT1A Pro better than TAC AA 2.0?
MT1A Pro has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,000 lm | 800 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 32,400 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 360 m | — |
| Runtime at maximum output | 45 min | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SFT-25R | NiteLab UHi 25 |
| LED maker | Luminus | NiteLab |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AA | AA |
| Battery capacity | — | 1,100 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 58 h | 10 h |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | 2 m | — |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 1.5 m | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Pocket clip | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | — | 52 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 4 | 3 |
| Switch | Tail switch | Tail switch |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
