- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- TAC AA 2.0 vs MT2A Pro
Acebeam TAC AA 2.0 vs Nitecore MT2A Pro
What TAC AA 2.0 does better (3) and where MT2A Pro wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.9Brightness & throw4.2
4.7Battery & charging3.2
6.5Build & durability9.2
5.9Features5.9
Why is TAC AA 2.0 better than MT2A Pro?
- Maximum runtime58 h vs 20 h2.9×
- Peak beam intensity32,400 cd vs 16,500 cd+96%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)360 m vs 255 m+41%
Why is MT2A Pro better than TAC AA 2.0?
- Submersible to2 m vs 60 m30×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,000 lm | 1,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 32,400 cd | 16,500 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 360 m | 255 m |
| Runtime at maximum output | 45 min | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SFT-25R | NiteLab UHi 20 |
| LED maker | Luminus | NiteLab |
| Number of LEDs | — | 2 |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AA | AA |
| Battery capacity | — | 1,600 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 58 h | 20 h |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | 2 m | 60 m |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 1.5 m | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Pocket clip | — | Yes |
| Can tail-stand | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Head diameter / width | — | 11 mm |
| Weight | — | 88 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 4 | — |
| Switch | Tail switch | Tail switch |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Colours | — | Black |
