- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- TAC AA 2.0 vs Night Cutter Pro F40R
Acebeam TAC AA 2.0 vs VARTA Night Cutter Pro F40R
What TAC AA 2.0 does better (2) and where Night Cutter Pro F40R wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.9Brightness & throw6.0
4.7Battery & charging6.3
6.5Build & durability2.8
5.9Features5.9
Why is TAC AA 2.0 better than Night Cutter Pro F40R?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)360 m vs 350 m+3%
- Maximum runtime58 h vs 48 h+21%
Why is Night Cutter Pro F40R better than TAC AA 2.0?
- Maximum output1,000 lm vs 2,000 lm2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,000 lm | 2,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 32,400 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 360 m | 350 m |
| Runtime at maximum output | 45 min | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SFT-25R | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AA | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Battery capacity | — | 5,200 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 58 h | 48 h |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Power bank function | — | Yes |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Submersible to | 2 m | — |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 1.5 m | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | — | 233 mm |
| Head diameter / width | — | 44 mm |
| Weight | — | 380 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 4 | — |
| Switch | Tail switch | — |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Colours | — | Black |
