- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- TAC AA 2.0 vs L1
Acebeam TAC AA 2.0 vs Wuben L1
What TAC AA 2.0 does better (2) and where L1 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.9Brightness & throw5.9
4.7Battery & charging7.5
6.5Build & durability6.8
3.5Light quality7.1
Why is TAC AA 2.0 better than L1?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)360 m vs 350 m+3%
- Peak beam intensity32,400 cd vs 30,620 cd+6%
Why is L1 better than TAC AA 2.0?
- Maximum output1,000 lm vs 2,000 lm2×
- Maximum runtime58 h vs 90 h+55%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,000 lm | 2,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 32,400 cd | 30,620 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 360 m | 350 m |
| Runtime at maximum output | 45 min | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SFT-25R | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | Osram |
| Colour rendering (CRI) | — | 90 |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AA | — |
| Maximum runtime | 58 h | 90 h |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Power bank function | — | Yes |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | 2 m | — |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 1.5 m | 1.5 m |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Magnetic tail / base | — | Yes |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 4 | — |
| Switch | Tail switch | Tail switch |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
