How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare791 models · updated Oct 21, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. TAC AA 2.0 vs T4

Acebeam TAC AA 2.0 vs Wuben T4

What TAC AA 2.0 does better (1) and where T4 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Acebeam TAC AA 2.0
Acebeam · 2025TAC AA 2.0
5.6Score
1 advantage≈ $40
vs
Wuben T4
Wuben · 2024T4
7.0Score
3 advantages≈ $40
Higher score
4.9Brightness & throw5.4
4.7Battery & charging6.7
6.5Build & durability7.8
5.9Features5.9

Why is TAC AA 2.0 better than T4?

  1. Maximum output1,000 lm vs 850 lm+18%

Why is T4 better than TAC AA 2.0?

  1. Beam distance (ANSI FL1)360 m vs 401 m+11%
  2. Peak beam intensity32,400 cd vs 40,200 cd+24%
  3. Maximum runtime58 h vs 70 h+21%
Specifications

Side by side

Wuben T4Wuben T4≈ $407.0
Light output
Maximum output1,000 lm850 lm
Peak beam intensity32,400 cd40,200 cd
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)360 m401 m
Runtime at maximum output45 min—
Light sourceLEDLED
LED & beam
LED emitterLuminus SFT-25R—
LED makerLuminusOsram
Colour temperature6,500K—
Battery & charging
BatteryAA—
Maximum runtime58 h70 h
Rechargeable—Yes
USB-C charging—Yes
Charging time—1.7 h
Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123AYes—
Build & durability
Protection ratingIP68IP68
Water protection (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Submersible to2 m—
Impact resistance (drop)1.5 m—
Body materialAluminiumAluminium
Modes & features
Brightness levels4—
SwitchTail switchTail switch
Tactical tail switch (momentary on)—Yes
StrobeYesYes
SOS / beaconYes—
Lockout—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare