- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- TAC AA 2.0 vs X3 Owl
Acebeam TAC AA 2.0 vs Wuben X3 Owl
What TAC AA 2.0 does better (0) and where X3 Owl wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.9Brightness & throw3.8
Why is TAC AA 2.0 better than X3 Owl?
TAC AA 2.0 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is X3 Owl better than TAC AA 2.0?
X3 Owl has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 1,000 lm | 1,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 32,400 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 360 m | — |
| Runtime at maximum output | 45 min | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SFT-25R | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AA | — |
| Maximum runtime | 58 h | — |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Submersible to | 2 m | — |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 1.5 m | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 4 | — |
| Switch | Tail switch | — |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Red light | — | Yes |
