How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare791 models · updated Oct 21, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. TAC AA 2.0 vs X4

Acebeam TAC AA 2.0 vs Wuben X4

What TAC AA 2.0 does better (1) and where X4 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Acebeam TAC AA 2.0
Acebeam · 2025TAC AA 2.0
5.6Score
1 advantage≈ $40
Higher score
vs
Wuben X4
Wuben · 2025X4
5.3Score
2 advantages≈ $40
4.9Brightness & throw4.8
4.7Battery & charging8.6
6.5Build & durability2.6
3.5Light quality5.5
5.9Features5.9

Why is TAC AA 2.0 better than X4?

  1. Water protection (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx5+60%

Why is X4 better than TAC AA 2.0?

  1. Maximum runtime58 h vs 720 h12.4×
  2. Maximum output1,000 lm vs 1,500 lm+50%
Specifications

Side by side

Wuben X4Wuben X4≈ $405.3
Light output
Maximum output1,000 lm1,500 lm
Peak beam intensity32,400 cd—
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)360 m—
Runtime at maximum output45 min—
Light sourceLEDLED
LED & beam
LED emitterLuminus SFT-25R—
LED makerLuminus—
Number of LEDs—4
Colour temperature6,500K4,000K
Battery & charging
BatteryAA—
Battery capacity—3,400 mAh
Maximum runtime58 h720 h
Rechargeable—Yes
USB-C charging—Yes
Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123AYes—
Build & durability
Protection ratingIP68IP65
Water protection (IPx)IPx8IPx5
Submersible to2 m—
Impact resistance (drop)1.5 m—
Body materialAluminium—
Magnetic tail / base—Yes
Pocket clip—Yes
Modes & features
Brightness levels4—
Stepless (ramping) brightness—Yes
SwitchTail switch—
Tactical tail switch (momentary on)—Yes
StrobeYes—
SOS / beaconYes—
Green / blue / RGB light—Yes
Lockout—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare