- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- Terminator M1 vs TK72R
Acebeam Terminator M1 vs Fenix TK72R
What Terminator M1 does better (3) and where TK72R wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.5Brightness & throw6.7
5.8Battery & charging4.9
3.6Build & durability2.8
5.9Features5.9
Why is Terminator M1 better than TK72R?
- USB-C chargingYes · TK72R: No
- Weight232 g vs 411 g+77%
- Maximum runtime67.2 h vs 50 h+34%
Why is TK72R better than Terminator M1?
- Maximum output3,500 lm vs 9,000 lm2.6×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)231 m vs 286 m+24%
- Peak beam intensity13,340 cd vs 20,450 cd+53%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 3,500 lm | 9,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 13,340 cd | 20,450 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 231 m | 286 m |
| Light source | LED + LEP | LED |
| Adjustable focus (zoom) | Yes | — |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | — | Cree XHP70 |
| LED maker | — | Cree |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | — |
| Battery capacity | — | 7,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 67.2 h | 50 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | No |
| Power bank function | — | Yes |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 104 mm | 156 mm |
| Head diameter / width | — | 59 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | — | 50 mm |
| Weight | 232 g | 411 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
