- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- W20 LEP vs HT18R V2.0
Acebeam W20 LEP vs Fenix HT18R V2.0
What W20 LEP does better (1) and where HT18R V2.0 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.8Brightness & throw8.9
2.6Battery & charging8.4
6.5Build & durability4.3
5.9Features5.9
Why is W20 LEP better than HT18R V2.0?
- Weight131 g vs 358 g2.7×
Why is HT18R V2.0 better than W20 LEP?
- Maximum output600 lm vs 3,700 lm6.2×
- Battery capacity850 mAh vs 6,000 mAh7.1×
- Maximum runtime1.3 h vs 87 h66.9×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 600 lm | 3,700 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 302,500 cd | 302,500 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 1,100 m | 1,100 m |
| Runtime at maximum output | 80 min | — |
| Light source | LEP (laser-excited phosphor) | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | — | Luminus SFT-90 |
| LED maker | — | Luminus |
| Colour temperature | — | 6,500K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 16340 / RCR123A Li-ion, CR123A | 21700 Li-ion |
| Battery capacity | 850 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 1.3 h | 87 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | — | 1.5 m |
| Impact resistance (drop) | 1.5 m | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 115.1 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 32 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 25.4 mm | — |
| Weight | 131 g | 358 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Tail switch | Side switch |
| Tactical tail switch (momentary on) | Yes | — |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | — | Yes |
| Lockout | — | Yes |
| Mode memory | — | Yes |
| Colours | — | Black |
