- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- HT18R V2.0 vs Seeker 4 IPX8
Fenix HT18R V2.0 vs Olight Seeker 4 IPX8
What HT18R V2.0 does better (3) and where Seeker 4 IPX8 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.2Brightness & throw8.0
Why is HT18R V2.0 better than Seeker 4 IPX8?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)1,100 m vs 400 m2.8×
- Maximum output3,700 lm vs 3,100 lm+19%
- RechargeableYes · Seeker 4 IPX8: No
Why is Seeker 4 IPX8 better than HT18R V2.0?
Seeker 4 IPX8 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 3,700 lm | 3,100 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 302,500 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 1,100 m | 400 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SFT-90 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | — |
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 87 h | — |
| Rechargeable | Yes | No |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Submersible to | 1.5 m | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | Stainless steel |
| Size & weight | ||
| Weight | 358 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Side switch | — |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
