- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- W50 2.0 vs TT3R
Acebeam W50 2.0 vs Ledlenser TT3R
What W50 2.0 does better (1) and where TT3R wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is W50 2.0 better than TT3R?
- Maximum output2,200 lm vs 1,900 lm+16%
Why is TT3R better than W50 2.0?
TT3R has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 2,200 lm | 1,900 lm |
| Light source | LEP (laser-excited phosphor) | LED |
| Adjustable focus (zoom) | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 18650 Li-ion | 21700 Li-ion |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 216.4 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 84 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 79 mm | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| Red light | — | Yes |
| Green / blue / RGB light | — | Yes |
