- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- X25 vs LR40R V2.0
Acebeam X25 vs Fenix LR40R V2.0
What X25 does better (3) and where LR40R V2.0 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.1Brightness & throw9.1
4.1Battery & charging8.4
7.8Build & durability4.2
9.0Light quality9.8
5.9Features5.9
Why is X25 better than LR40R V2.0?
- Peak beam intensity602,952 cd vs 202,500 cd3×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)1,553 m vs 900 m+73%
- Maximum output23,000 lm vs 15,000 lm+53%
Why is LR40R V2.0 better than X25?
- Maximum runtime6 h vs 177 h29.5×
- Brightness levels6 vs 162.7×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 23,000 lm | 15,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 602,952 cd | 202,500 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 1,553 m | 900 m |
| Runtime at maximum output | 1 min | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SFT-25R | Luminus SFT-70 |
| LED maker | Luminus | Luminus |
| Number of LEDs | 16 | 6 |
| Colour temperature | — | 6,000K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Number of batteries | — | 3 |
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 6 h | 177 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Power bank function | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | — | 175 mm |
| Head diameter / width | — | 82 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | — | 55 mm |
| Weight | — | 842 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 6 | 16 |
| Switch | Dual switches | Rotary / scroll wheel |
| Strobe | Yes | Yes |
| SOS / beacon | — | Yes |
| Green / blue / RGB light | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | — | Yes |
| Colours | — | Black |
