How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare1,338 models · updated Nov 10, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. X50 2.0 vs Saint 31

Acebeam X50 2.0 vs Nextorch Saint 31

What X50 2.0 does better (4) and where Saint 31 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Acebeam X50 2.0
Acebeam · 2022X50 2.0
7.2Score
4 advantages≈ $380
vs
Nextorch Saint 31
Nextorch · 2021Saint 31
7.3Score
0 advantages≈ $470
Higher score
9.4Brightness & throw9.4
3.6Build & durability3.3

Why is X50 2.0 better than Saint 31?

  1. Maximum output45,000 lm vs 20,000 lm2.2×
  2. Weight756 g vs 1,480 g+96%
  3. Beam distance (ANSI FL1)977 m vs 740 m+32%
  4. Submersible to2 m vs 1 m2×

Why is Saint 31 better than X50 2.0?

Saint 31 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Acebeam X50 2.0Acebeam X50 2.0≈ $3807.2
Light output
Maximum output45,000 lm20,000 lm
Peak beam intensity238,632 cd—
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)977 m740 m
Light sourceLEDLED
LED & beam
LED emitterCree XHP70.3 HI—
LED makerCree—
Number of LEDs—8
Colour temperature6,500K—
Battery & charging
Battery—Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po
Maximum runtime—60 h
Rechargeable—Yes
USB-C chargingYes—
Power bank functionYes—
Build & durability
Water protection (IPx)—IPx7
Submersible to2 m1 m
Body material—Aluminium
Size & weight
Length / height139.6 mm285 mm
Weight756 g1,480 g
Modes & features
LockoutYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare