- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- X50 2.0 vs M20K
Acebeam X50 2.0 vs Nitecore M20K
What X50 2.0 does better (1) and where M20K wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is X50 2.0 better than M20K?
- Maximum output45,000 lm vs 2,000 lm22.5×
Why is M20K better than X50 2.0?
- Weight756 g vs 290 g2.6×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 45,000 lm | 2,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 238,632 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 977 m | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Cree XHP70.3 HI | — |
| LED maker | Cree | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | — | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Number of batteries | — | 1 |
| Battery capacity | — | 9,600 mAh |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Power bank function | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Submersible to | 2 m | — |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 139.6 mm | 145 mm |
| Head diameter / width | — | 50 mm |
| Weight | 756 g | 290 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | — | Yes |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
