How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare1,338 models · updated Nov 10, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. X80GT 3 vs TA31

Acebeam X80GT 3 vs Nextorch TA31

What X80GT 3 does better (3) and where TA31 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Acebeam X80GT 3
Acebeam · 2026X80GT 3
8.0Score
3 advantages≈ $240
vs
Nextorch TA31
Nextorch · 2024TA31
9.0Score
3 advantages≈ $245
Higher score
8.6Brightness & throw8.0
5.3Battery & charging8.9
4.5Build & durability6.6
5.9Features5.9

Why is X80GT 3 better than TA31?

  1. Maximum output30,000 lm vs 10,000 lm3×
  2. Beam distance (ANSI FL1)430 m vs 380 m+13%
  3. Peak beam intensity46,220 cd vs 36,100 cd+28%

Why is TA31 better than X80GT 3?

  1. Battery capacity3,000 mAh vs 4,800 mAh+60%
  2. Weight560 g vs 425 g+32%
  3. Impact resistance (drop)1 m vs 2 m2×
Specifications

Side by side

Acebeam X80GT 3Acebeam X80GT 3≈ $2408.0
Nextorch TA31Nextorch TA31≈ $2459.0
Light output
Maximum output30,000 lm10,000 lm
Peak beam intensity46,220 cd36,100 cd
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)430 m380 m
Light sourceLEDLED
LED & beam
LED emitterNichia 519A—
LED makerNichia—
Number of LEDs24—
Colour rendering (CRI)95—
Colour temperature6,000K—
Battery & charging
Battery18650 Li-ion—
Battery capacity3,000 mAh4,800 mAh
Maximum runtime—170 h
RechargeableYesYes
USB-C chargingYes—
Build & durability
Protection ratingIP68IPX8
Water protection (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Impact resistance (drop)1 m2 m
Size & weight
Length / height128 mm156 mm
Head diameter / width—53 mm
Body diameter / depth—49 mm
Weight560 g425 g
Modes & features
Stepless (ramping) brightnessYes—
Tactical tail switch (momentary on)—Yes
Strobe—Yes
Red lightYes—
UV lightYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare