How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare1,338 models · updated Nov 10, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. Future T400FR vs 779.CBTPB

Ansmann Future T400FR vs Facom 779.CBTPB

What Future T400FR does better (2) and where 779.CBTPB wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Ansmann Future T400FR
Ansmann · 2018Future T400FR
4.6Score
2 advantages≈ $60
Higher score
vs
Facom 779.CBTPB
Facom · 2019779.CBTPB
4.5Score
2 advantages≈ $70
3.7Brightness & throw4.2
3.0Battery & charging4.2
2.7Build & durability3.7

Why is Future T400FR better than 779.CBTPB?

  1. Maximum output400 lm vs 309 lm+29%
  2. RechargeableYes · 779.CBTPB: No

Why is 779.CBTPB better than Future T400FR?

  1. Maximum runtime9 h vs 51 h5.7×
  2. Beam distance (ANSI FL1)175 m vs 233 m+33%
Specifications

Side by side

Facom 779.CBTPBFacom 779.CBTPB≈ $704.5
Light output
Maximum output400 lm309 lm
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)175 m233 m
Light sourceLEDLED
Adjustable focus (zoom)Yes—
LED & beam
Number of LEDs1—
Battery & charging
Battery18650 Li-ionAAA
Maximum runtime9 h51 h
RechargeableYesNo
Build & durability
Water protection (IPx)IPx4IPx4
Size & weight
Length / height168 mm—
Head diameter / width32 mm—
Weight—176 g
Modes & features
StrobeYes—
SOS / beaconYes—
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare