How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare1,338 models · updated Nov 10, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. 779.CBTPB vs EX7

Facom 779.CBTPB vs Ledlenser EX7

What 779.CBTPB does better (4) and where EX7 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Facom 779.CBTPB
Facom · 2019779.CBTPB
4.5Score
4 advantages≈ $70
Higher score
vs
Ledlenser EX7
Ledlenser · 2018EX7
4.1Score
0 advantages≈ $70
4.2Brightness & throw2.9
4.2Battery & charging3.8
3.7Build & durability4.1

Why is 779.CBTPB better than EX7?

  1. Beam distance (ANSI FL1)233 m vs 120 m+94%
  2. Maximum output309 lm vs 200 lm+54%
  3. Weight176 g vs 232 g+32%
  4. Maximum runtime51 h vs 45 h+13%

Why is EX7 better than 779.CBTPB?

EX7 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Facom 779.CBTPBFacom 779.CBTPB≈ $704.5
Ledlenser EX7Ledlenser EX7≈ $704.1
Light output
Maximum output309 lm200 lm
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)233 m120 m
Light sourceLEDLED
LED & beam
Number of LEDs—1
Battery & charging
BatteryAAA—
Maximum runtime51 h45 h
RechargeableNoNo
Build & durability
Water protection (IPx)IPx4—
Size & weight
Length / height—162 mm
Head diameter / width—41 mm
Weight176 g232 g
Modes & features
ColoursBlackYellow
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare