- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- M200F vs Polysteel 600R
Ansmann M200F vs Coast Polysteel 600R
What M200F does better (1) and where Polysteel 600R wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.0Brightness & throw4.3
2.7Battery & charging2.8
2.7Build & durability3.3
Why is M200F better than Polysteel 600R?
- Maximum runtime22 h vs 5.8 h3.8×
Why is Polysteel 600R better than M200F?
- Maximum output240 lm vs 530 lm2.2×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)120 m vs 209 m+74%
- RechargeableNo · M200F: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 240 lm | 530 lm |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 120 m | 209 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| Number of LEDs | 1 | 1 |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AA | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Number of batteries | 2 | — |
| Maximum runtime | 22 h | 5.8 h |
| Rechargeable | No | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Body material | — | Stainless steel |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | — | 200 mm |
| Weight | — | 340 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Colours | Black | Black |
