- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- M200F vs 3 C-Cell
Ansmann M200F vs Maglite 3 C-Cell
What M200F does better (2) and where 3 C-Cell wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is M200F better than 3 C-Cell?
- Maximum output240 lm vs 45 lm5.3×
- Maximum runtime22 h vs 4 h5.5×
Why is 3 C-Cell better than M200F?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)120 m vs 274 m2.3×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 240 lm | 45 lm |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 120 m | 274 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| Number of LEDs | 1 | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AA | C |
| Number of batteries | 2 | 3 |
| Maximum runtime | 22 h | 4 h |
| Rechargeable | No | No |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Pocket clip | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | — | 275 mm |
| Weight | — | 540 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Colours | Black | Black |
