- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- BT-2238078 vs TL 410 F
BASEtech BT-2238078 vs Brennenstuhl TL 410 F
What BT-2238078 does better (2) and where TL 410 F wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.7Brightness & throw5.1
5.0Build & durability9.0
Why is BT-2238078 better than TL 410 F?
- Maximum output900 lm vs 350 lm2.6×
- RechargeableYes · TL 410 F: No
Why is TL 410 F better than BT-2238078?
- Water protection (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx82×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 900 lm | 350 lm |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| Number of LEDs | — | 3 |
| Colour temperature | 6,000K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po | — |
| Number of batteries | — | 3 |
| Rechargeable | Yes | No |
| Charging time | 7 h | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | — | 3 m |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | — | 30 mm |
| Weight | 368 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| SOS / beacon | — | Yes |
| Colours | Black | Black |
