- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- HL 400 AC vs E12 V2.0
Brennenstuhl HL 400 AC vs Fenix E12 V2.0
What HL 400 AC does better (1) and where E12 V2.0 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is HL 400 AC better than E12 V2.0?
- Maximum output400 lm vs 160 lm2.5×
Why is E12 V2.0 better than HL 400 AC?
E12 V2.0 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 400 lm | 160 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | — | 1,160 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | — | 68 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| Number of LEDs | 2 | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | — | AA |
| Maximum runtime | — | 70 h |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | — | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | 60 m | — |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Pocket clip | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | — | 76.6 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 60 mm | 19 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | — | 17.6 mm |
| Weight | — | 27 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | — | 3 |
| Switch | — | Tail switch |
| Colours | Grey, Black | — |
