- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- XP11R vs TK20R UE
Coast XP11R vs Fenix TK20R UE
What XP11R does better (0) and where TK20R UE wins (5) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
XP11RTK20R UE
| XP11R | TK20R UE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 150 mm | 153.7 mm | −3.7 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 38 mm | 34 mm | +4 mm |
| Weight | 389 g | 204 g | +185 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is XP11R better than TK20R UE?
XP11R has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is TK20R UE better than XP11R?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)155 m vs 465 m3×
- Weight389 g vs 204 g+91%
- Maximum output2,100 lm vs 2,800 lm+33%
- RechargeableNo · XP11R: Yes
- Maximum runtime37 h vs 40 h+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 2,100 lm | 2,800 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | — | 54,060 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 155 m | 465 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | — | Luminus SFT-70 |
| LED maker | — | Luminus |
| Colour temperature | — | 6,500K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AAA | 21700 Li-ion |
| Number of batteries | 3 | — |
| Maximum runtime | 37 h | 40 h |
| Rechargeable | No | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 150 mm | 153.7 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 38 mm | 34 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | — | 25.4 mm |
| Weight | 389 g | 204 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Tactical tail switch (momentary on) | — | Yes |
| Strobe | — | Yes |
| Mode memory | — | Yes |
| Colours | Black | — |
