How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare1,103 models · updated Oct 23, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. Acid HPA1300 vs oStar

Cube Acid HPA1300 vs Nextorch oStar

What Acid HPA1300 does better (1) and where oStar wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Cube Acid HPA1300
Cube · 2022Acid HPA1300
6.8Score
1 advantage≈ $130
Higher score
vs
Nextorch oStar
Nextorch · 2022oStar
6.3Score
2 advantages≈ $85
8.5Brightness & throw5.9
2.5Battery & charging5.9

Why is Acid HPA1300 better than oStar?

  1. Maximum output1,300 lm vs 500 lm2.6×

Why is oStar better than Acid HPA1300?

  1. Maximum runtime11 h vs 60 h5.5×
  2. Weight192 g vs 87 g2.2×
Specifications

Side by side

Nextorch oStarNextorch oStar≈ $856.3
Light output
Maximum output1,300 lm500 lm
Peak beam intensity—4,290 cd
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)—131 m
Light sourceLEDLED
Battery & charging
Battery—18650 Li-ion
Maximum runtime11 h60 h
Rechargeable—Yes
Battery level indicatorYes—
Build & durability
Protection rating—IPX4
Water protection (IPx)—IPx4
Impact resistance (drop)—2 m
Size & weight
Length / height—78 mm
Head diameter / width—65 mm
Body diameter / depth—46 mm
Weight192 g87 g
Modes & features
SOS / beaconYes—
ColoursBlack—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare