- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- TAC 700 vs CH35
Energizer TAC 700 vs GP CH35
What TAC 700 does better (1) and where CH35 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is TAC 700 better than CH35?
- Maximum output700 lm vs 600 lm+17%
Why is CH35 better than TAC 700?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)100 m vs 130 m+30%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 700 lm | 600 lm |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 100 m | 130 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | CR123A | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Number of batteries | — | 3 |
| Maximum runtime | — | 60 h |
| Rechargeable | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 120 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 31 mm | — |
| Weight | 147 g | — |
| Modes & features | ||
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| Colours | Black | Green |
