- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- C7 V2.0 vs E06R
Fenix C7 V2.0 vs Fenix E06R
What C7 V2.0 does better (4) and where E06R wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
C7 V2.0E06R
| C7 V2.0 | E06R | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 150.6 mm | 69 mm | +81.6 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 40 mm | 29 mm | +11 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 27.5 mm | 16 mm | +11.5 mm |
| Weight | 256 g | 54 g | +202 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is C7 V2.0 better than E06R?
- Maximum output3,300 lm vs 700 lm4.7×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)575 m vs 110 m5.2×
- Peak beam intensity82,660 cd vs 3,020 cd27.4×
- Maximum runtime79 h vs 60 h+32%
Why is E06R better than C7 V2.0?
- Weight256 g vs 54 g4.7×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 3,300 lm | 700 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 82,660 cd | 3,020 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 575 m | 110 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SFT-70 | Luminus SST-12 |
| LED maker | Luminus | Luminus |
| Number of LEDs | — | 2 |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | 6,500K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | 21700 Li-ion | — |
| Battery capacity | — | 750 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 79 h | 60 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Magnetic tail / base | Yes | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 150.6 mm | 69 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 40 mm | 29 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 27.5 mm | 16 mm |
| Weight | 256 g | 54 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | — | 10 |
| Strobe | Yes | — |
| SOS / beacon | Yes | — |
| UV light | — | Yes |
| Laser pointer / aiming laser | — | Yes |
| Lockout | Yes | Yes |
| Mode memory | Yes | Yes |
