How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare791 models · updated Oct 21, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. C7 V2.0 vs TA30D

Fenix C7 V2.0 vs Nextorch TA30D

What C7 V2.0 does better (3) and where TA30D wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Fenix C7 V2.0
Fenix · 2026C7 V2.0
8.2Score
3 advantages≈ $80
Higher score
vs
Nextorch TA30D
Nextorch · 2026TA30D
0 advantages≈ $120
8.3Brightness & throw6.8

Why is C7 V2.0 better than TA30D?

  1. Maximum output3,300 lm vs 2,200 lm+50%
  2. Beam distance (ANSI FL1)575 m vs 410 m+40%
  3. RechargeableYes · TA30D: No

Why is TA30D better than C7 V2.0?

TA30D has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Fenix C7 V2.0Fenix C7 V2.0≈ $808.2
Light output
Maximum output3,300 lm2,200 lm
Peak beam intensity82,660 cd—
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)575 m410 m
Light sourceLEDLED
LED & beam
LED emitterLuminus SFT-70—
LED makerLuminus—
Colour temperature6,500K—
Battery & charging
Battery21700 Li-ion—
Maximum runtime79 h—
RechargeableYesNo
USB-C chargingYes—
Battery level indicatorYes—
Build & durability
Protection ratingIP68—
Water protection (IPx)IPx8—
Body materialAluminiumAluminium
Magnetic tail / baseYes—
Size & weight
Length / height150.6 mm—
Head diameter / width40 mm—
Body diameter / depth27.5 mm—
Weight256 g—
Modes & features
StrobeYes—
SOS / beaconYes—
LockoutYes—
Mode memoryYes—
Colours—Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare