How we scoreBlogAdvertise
html›body›main#compare791 models · updated Oct 21, 2026
  1. compoundsemi.com
  2. Compare
  3. C7 V2.0 vs L1

Fenix C7 V2.0 vs Wuben L1

What C7 V2.0 does better (3) and where L1 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Fenix C7 V2.0
Fenix · 2026C7 V2.0
8.2Score
3 advantages≈ $80
Higher score
vs
Wuben L1
Wuben · 2025L1
8.0Score
1 advantage≈ $55
8.3Brightness & throw5.9
6.7Battery & charging7.5
5.2Build & durability6.8

Why is C7 V2.0 better than L1?

  1. Peak beam intensity82,660 cd vs 30,620 cd2.7×
  2. Maximum output3,300 lm vs 2,000 lm+65%
  3. Beam distance (ANSI FL1)575 m vs 350 m+64%

Why is L1 better than C7 V2.0?

  1. Maximum runtime79 h vs 90 h+14%
Specifications

Side by side

Fenix C7 V2.0Fenix C7 V2.0≈ $808.2
Wuben L1Wuben L1≈ $558.0
Light output
Maximum output3,300 lm2,000 lm
Peak beam intensity82,660 cd30,620 cd
Beam distance (ANSI FL1)575 m350 m
Light sourceLEDLED
LED & beam
LED emitterLuminus SFT-70—
LED makerLuminusOsram
Colour rendering (CRI)—90
Colour temperature6,500K—
Battery & charging
Battery21700 Li-ion—
Maximum runtime79 h90 h
RechargeableYesYes
USB-C chargingYesYes
Battery level indicatorYes—
Power bank function—Yes
Build & durability
Protection ratingIP68IP68
Water protection (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Impact resistance (drop)—1.5 m
Body materialAluminium—
Magnetic tail / baseYesYes
Size & weight
Length / height150.6 mm—
Head diameter / width40 mm—
Body diameter / depth27.5 mm—
Weight256 g—
Modes & features
Switch—Tail switch
StrobeYes—
SOS / beaconYes—
LockoutYes—
Mode memoryYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare