- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E01 V2.0 vs E03R
Fenix E01 V2.0 vs Fenix E03R
What E01 V2.0 does better (3) and where E03R wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
E01 V2.0E03R
| E01 V2.0 | E03R | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 66.5 mm | 47 mm | +19.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 15 mm | 24 mm | −9 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 14 mm | 12 mm | +2 mm |
| Weight | 13 g | 22 g | −9 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is E01 V2.0 better than E03R?
- Weight13 g vs 22 g+69%
- Maximum runtime25 h vs 18 h+39%
- Water protection (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx6+33%
Why is E03R better than E01 V2.0?
- Maximum output100 lm vs 260 lm2.6×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)35 m vs 42 m+20%
- Peak beam intensity310 cd vs 440 cd+42%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 100 lm | 260 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 310 cd | 440 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 35 m | 42 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-20 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AAA | — |
| Battery capacity | — | 200 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 25 h | 18 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | — | Yes |
| Battery level indicator | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP66 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx6 |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 66.5 mm | 47 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 15 mm | 24 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 14 mm | 12 mm |
| Weight | 13 g | 22 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | — | 4 |
| Switch | Rotary / scroll wheel | — |
| Red light | — | Yes |
