- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E01 V2.0 vs E12 V2.0
Fenix E01 V2.0 vs Fenix E12 V2.0
What E01 V2.0 does better (1) and where E12 V2.0 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
E01 V2.0E12 V2.0
| E01 V2.0 | E12 V2.0 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 66.5 mm | 76.6 mm | −10.1 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 15 mm | 19 mm | −4 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 14 mm | 17.6 mm | −3.6 mm |
| Weight | 13 g | 27 g | −14 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is E01 V2.0 better than E12 V2.0?
- Weight13 g vs 27 g2.1×
Why is E12 V2.0 better than E01 V2.0?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)35 m vs 68 m+94%
- Peak beam intensity310 cd vs 1,160 cd3.7×
- Maximum runtime25 h vs 70 h2.8×
- Maximum output100 lm vs 160 lm+60%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 100 lm | 160 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 310 cd | 1,160 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 35 m | 68 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-20 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AAA | AA |
| Maximum runtime | 25 h | 70 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Pocket clip | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 66.5 mm | 76.6 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 15 mm | 19 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 14 mm | 17.6 mm |
| Weight | 13 g | 27 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | — | 3 |
| Switch | Rotary / scroll wheel | Tail switch |
