- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E01 V2.0 vs Thumb
Fenix E01 V2.0 vs Nitecore Thumb
What E01 V2.0 does better (5) and where Thumb wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
E01 V2.0Thumb
| E01 V2.0 | Thumb | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 66.5 mm | 74 mm | −7.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 15 mm | 24 mm | −9 mm |
| Weight | 13 g | 25 g | −12 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is E01 V2.0 better than Thumb?
- Water protection (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- Weight13 g vs 25 g+92%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)35 m vs 26 m+35%
- Maximum output100 lm vs 85 lm+18%
- Maximum runtime25 h vs 22 h+14%
Why is Thumb better than E01 V2.0?
Thumb has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 100 lm | 85 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 310 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 35 m | 26 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-20 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Number of LEDs | — | 2 |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AAA | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Maximum runtime | 25 h | 22 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Body material | — | Plastic / polymer |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 66.5 mm | 74 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 15 mm | 24 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 14 mm | — |
| Weight | 13 g | 25 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Rotary / scroll wheel | — |
| Red light | — | Yes |
| Colours | — | Black |
