- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E03R vs Thumb
Fenix E03R vs Nitecore Thumb
What E03R does better (4) and where Thumb wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
E03RThumb
| E03R | Thumb | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 47 mm | 74 mm | −27 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 24 mm | 24 mm | = |
| Weight | 22 g | 25 g | −3 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is E03R better than Thumb?
- Maximum output260 lm vs 85 lm3.1×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)42 m vs 26 m+62%
- Water protection (IPx)IPx6 vs IPx4+50%
- Weight22 g vs 25 g+14%
Why is Thumb better than E03R?
- Maximum runtime18 h vs 22 h+22%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 260 lm | 85 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 440 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 42 m | 26 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| Number of LEDs | — | 2 |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | — | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Battery capacity | 200 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 18 h | 22 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP66 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx6 | IPx4 |
| Body material | — | Plastic / polymer |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 47 mm | 74 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 24 mm | 24 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 12 mm | — |
| Weight | 22 g | 25 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 4 | — |
| Red light | Yes | Yes |
| Colours | — | Black |
