- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E03R V2.0 vs E12 V2.0
Fenix E03R V2.0 vs Fenix E12 V2.0
What E03R V2.0 does better (3) and where E12 V2.0 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
E03R V2.0E12 V2.0
| E03R V2.0 | E12 V2.0 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 52.5 mm | 76.6 mm | −24.1 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 26 mm | 19 mm | +7 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 13 mm | 17.6 mm | −4.6 mm |
| Weight | 30 g | 27 g | +3 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is E03R V2.0 better than E12 V2.0?
- Maximum output500 lm vs 160 lm3.1×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)90 m vs 68 m+32%
- Peak beam intensity2,020 cd vs 1,160 cd+74%
Why is E12 V2.0 better than E03R V2.0?
- Maximum runtime30 h vs 70 h2.3×
- Water protection (IPx)IPx6 vs IPx8+33%
- Weight30 g vs 27 g+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 500 lm | 160 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 2,020 cd | 1,160 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 90 m | 68 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| Number of LEDs | 2 | — |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po | AA |
| Battery capacity | 400 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 30 h | 70 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | — |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP66 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx6 | IPx8 |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Pocket clip | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 52.5 mm | 76.6 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 26 mm | 19 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 13 mm | 17.6 mm |
| Weight | 30 g | 27 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | — | 3 |
| Switch | — | Tail switch |
| Red light | Yes | — |
| Green / blue / RGB light | Yes | — |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
