- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E03R V2.0 vs LD05 V2.0
Fenix E03R V2.0 vs Fenix LD05 V2.0
What E03R V2.0 does better (3) and where LD05 V2.0 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is E03R V2.0 better than LD05 V2.0?
- Maximum output500 lm vs 100 lm5×
- Peak beam intensity2,020 cd vs 730 cd2.8×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)90 m vs 54 m+67%
Why is LD05 V2.0 better than E03R V2.0?
- Maximum runtime30 h vs 70 h2.3×
- Weight30 g vs 28 g+7%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 500 lm | 100 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 2,020 cd | 730 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 90 m | 54 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | — | Cree XQ-E |
| LED maker | — | Cree |
| Number of LEDs | 2 | — |
| Colour rendering (CRI) | — | 90 |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | 3,000K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po | AAA |
| Battery capacity | 400 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 30 h | 70 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | — |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP66 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx6 | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 52.5 mm | 135 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 26 mm | — |
| Body diameter / depth | 13 mm | — |
| Weight | 30 g | 28 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | — | 3 |
| Switch | — | Tail switch |
| Red light | Yes | — |
| UV light | — | Yes |
| Green / blue / RGB light | Yes | — |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | Yes | Yes |
