- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E03R V2.0 vs i1R 2 EOS
Fenix E03R V2.0 vs Olight i1R 2 EOS
What E03R V2.0 does better (2) and where i1R 2 EOS wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
E03R V2.0i1R 2 EOS
| E03R V2.0 | i1R 2 EOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 52.5 mm | 44 mm | +8.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 26 mm | 14 mm | +12 mm |
| Weight | 30 g | 14 g | +16 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is E03R V2.0 better than i1R 2 EOS?
- Maximum output500 lm vs 150 lm3.3×
- Maximum runtime30 h vs 6 h5×
Why is i1R 2 EOS better than E03R V2.0?
- Weight30 g vs 14 g2.1×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 500 lm | 150 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 2,020 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 90 m | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| Number of LEDs | 2 | 1 |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Battery capacity | 400 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 30 h | 6 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Charging time | — | 1.2 h |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP66 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx6 | — |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 52.5 mm | 44 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 26 mm | 14 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 13 mm | — |
| Weight | 30 g | 14 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Red light | Yes | — |
| Green / blue / RGB light | Yes | — |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
