- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E04R vs E12 V3.0
Fenix E04R vs Fenix E12 V3.0
What E04R does better (3) and where E12 V3.0 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
E04RE12 V3.0
| E04R | E12 V3.0 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 58.5 mm | 81.5 mm | −23 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 30 mm | 19.3 mm | +10.7 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 29.8 mm | 17.4 mm | +12.4 mm |
| Weight | 41 g | 54 g | −13 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is E04R better than E12 V3.0?
- Maximum output300 lm vs 200 lm+50%
- Weight41 g vs 54 g+32%
- RechargeableYes · E12 V3.0: No
Why is E12 V3.0 better than E04R?
- Peak beam intensity530 cd vs 1,520 cd2.9×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)46 m vs 78 m+70%
- Water protection (IPx)IPx6 vs IPx8+33%
- Maximum runtime87 h vs 100 h+15%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 300 lm | 200 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 530 cd | 1,520 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 46 m | 78 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-12 | Luminus SST-20 |
| LED maker | Luminus | Luminus |
| Colour temperature | 6,500K | 4,000K |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po | AA |
| Battery capacity | 400 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 87 h | 100 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | No |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP66 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx6 | IPx8 |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Magnetic tail / base | — | Yes |
| Pocket clip | Yes | Yes |
| Can tail-stand | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 58.5 mm | 81.5 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 30 mm | 19.3 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 29.8 mm | 17.4 mm |
| Weight | 41 g | 54 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Switch | Dual switches | Tail switch |
| Red light | Yes | — |
| Green / blue / RGB light | Yes | — |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | Yes | Yes |
| Colours | — | Black |
