- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E05R vs E12 V2.0
Fenix E05R vs Fenix E12 V2.0
What E05R does better (3) and where E12 V2.0 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
E05RE12 V2.0
| E05R | E12 V2.0 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 68 mm | 76.6 mm | −8.6 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 15.3 mm | 19 mm | −3.7 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 15 mm | 17.6 mm | −2.6 mm |
| Weight | 24 g | 27 g | −3 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is E05R better than E12 V2.0?
- Maximum output400 lm vs 160 lm2.5×
- Weight24 g vs 27 g+12%
- Brightness levels4 vs 3+33%
Why is E12 V2.0 better than E05R?
- Maximum runtime30 h vs 70 h2.3×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)64 m vs 68 m+6%
- Peak beam intensity1,020 cd vs 1,160 cd+14%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 400 lm | 160 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 1,020 cd | 1,160 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 64 m | 68 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-20 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AAA | AA |
| Battery capacity | 320 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 30 h | 70 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | — |
| USB-C charging | No | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Body material | Aluminium | — |
| Pocket clip | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 68 mm | 76.6 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 15.3 mm | 19 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 15 mm | 17.6 mm |
| Weight | 24 g | 27 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 4 | 3 |
| Switch | Side switch | Tail switch |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
