- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E05R vs K3 V2.0
Fenix E05R vs Nextorch K3 V2.0
What E05R does better (6) and where K3 V2.0 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
E05RK3 V2.0
| E05R | K3 V2.0 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 68 mm | 150 mm | −82 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 15.3 mm | 14 mm | +1.3 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 15 mm | 12 mm | +3 mm |
| Weight | 24 g | 28 g | −4 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is E05R better than K3 V2.0?
- Maximum output400 lm vs 250 lm+60%
- Maximum runtime30 h vs 20 h+50%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)64 m vs 60 m+7%
- Weight24 g vs 28 g+17%
- Water protection (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx7+14%
- Peak beam intensity1,020 cd vs 900 cd+13%
Why is K3 V2.0 better than E05R?
K3 V2.0 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 400 lm | 250 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 1,020 cd | 900 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 64 m | 60 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-20 | Cree XP-G |
| LED maker | Luminus | Cree |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AAA | AAA |
| Battery capacity | 320 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 30 h | 20 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | — |
| USB-C charging | No | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IPX7 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx7 |
| Impact resistance (drop) | — | 1 m |
| Body material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 68 mm | 150 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 15.3 mm | 14 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 15 mm | 12 mm |
| Weight | 24 g | 28 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 4 | 4 |
| Switch | Side switch | — |
| Strobe | — | Yes |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | — | Yes |
