- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E05R vs Thumb
Fenix E05R vs Nitecore Thumb
What E05R does better (5) and where Thumb wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
E05RThumb
| E05R | Thumb | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 68 mm | 74 mm | −6 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 15.3 mm | 24 mm | −8.7 mm |
| Weight | 24 g | 25 g | −1 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is E05R better than Thumb?
- Maximum output400 lm vs 85 lm4.7×
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)64 m vs 26 m2.5×
- Water protection (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- Maximum runtime30 h vs 22 h+36%
- Weight24 g vs 25 g+4%
Why is Thumb better than E05R?
- USB-C chargingNo · E05R: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 400 lm | 85 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 1,020 cd | — |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 64 m | 26 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-20 | — |
| LED maker | Luminus | — |
| Number of LEDs | — | 2 |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | AAA | Built-in Li-ion / Li-Po |
| Battery capacity | 320 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 30 h | 22 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | No | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | — |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Body material | Aluminium | Plastic / polymer |
| Pocket clip | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 68 mm | 74 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 15.3 mm | 24 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 15 mm | — |
| Weight | 24 g | 25 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 4 | — |
| Switch | Side switch | — |
| Red light | — | Yes |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
| Colours | — | Black |
