- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E09R vs E20 V2.0
Fenix E09R vs Fenix E20 V2.0
What E09R does better (2) and where E20 V2.0 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
E09RE20 V2.0
| E09R | E20 V2.0 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length / height | 79 mm | 127 mm | −48 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 19.3 mm | 21 mm | −1.7 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 18.4 mm | 16.8 mm | +1.6 mm |
| Weight | 45 g | 42 g | +3 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is E09R better than E20 V2.0?
- Maximum output600 lm vs 350 lm+71%
- Brightness levels5 vs 4+25%
Why is E20 V2.0 better than E09R?
- Maximum runtime70 h vs 200 h2.9×
- Peak beam intensity2,070 cd vs 3,970 cd+92%
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)91 m vs 126 m+38%
- Weight45 g vs 42 g+7%
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 600 lm | 350 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 2,070 cd | 3,970 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 91 m | 126 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-20 | Luminus SST-20 |
| LED maker | Luminus | Luminus |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | — | AA |
| Battery capacity | 800 mAh | — |
| Maximum runtime | 70 h | 200 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | — |
| USB-C charging | Yes | — |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | — | 2 m |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 79 mm | 127 mm |
| Head diameter / width | 19.3 mm | 21 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 18.4 mm | 16.8 mm |
| Weight | 45 g | 42 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 5 | 4 |
| Switch | Side switch | Tail switch |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
