- compoundsemi.com
- Compare
- E09R vs MT2A Pro
Fenix E09R vs Nitecore MT2A Pro
What E09R does better (2) and where MT2A Pro wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Why is E09R better than MT2A Pro?
- Maximum runtime70 h vs 20 h3.5×
- Weight45 g vs 88 g+96%
Why is MT2A Pro better than E09R?
- Beam distance (ANSI FL1)91 m vs 255 m2.8×
- Peak beam intensity2,070 cd vs 16,500 cd8×
- Maximum output600 lm vs 1,000 lm+67%
- Battery capacity800 mAh vs 1,600 mAh2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Light output | ||
| Maximum output | 600 lm | 1,000 lm |
| Peak beam intensity | 2,070 cd | 16,500 cd |
| Beam distance (ANSI FL1) | 91 m | 255 m |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| LED & beam | ||
| LED emitter | Luminus SST-20 | NiteLab UHi 20 |
| LED maker | Luminus | NiteLab |
| Number of LEDs | — | 2 |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery | — | AA |
| Battery capacity | 800 mAh | 1,600 mAh |
| Maximum runtime | 70 h | 20 h |
| Rechargeable | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Also runs on AA/AAA/CR123A | — | Yes |
| Build & durability | ||
| Protection rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Submersible to | — | 60 m |
| Body material | — | Aluminium |
| Pocket clip | — | Yes |
| Can tail-stand | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Length / height | 79 mm | — |
| Head diameter / width | 19.3 mm | 11 mm |
| Body diameter / depth | 18.4 mm | — |
| Weight | 45 g | 88 g |
| Modes & features | ||
| Brightness levels | 5 | — |
| Switch | Side switch | Tail switch |
| Lockout | Yes | — |
| Mode memory | Yes | — |
| Colours | — | Black |
